Quentin Tarantino is one of the most talented and
interesting writer/directors working in Hollywood today. He’s a man who has
honed a unique filmmaking vision with some of the coolest films you’ll ever
see. His name alone brings with it certain expectations of quality, and he
always seems to come through.
With Django Unchained,
Tarantino tackles the genre of spaghetti westerns and adds another quality film
to his impressive resume.
Django Unchained
is, at its heart, a love story. Yes, it’s cartoonishly hyper-violent. Sure, characters
use language that would make my grandmother blush. Absolutely, some of the
scenes are surprising and shocking. Yes, there are great liberties taken
regarding the history of the South and the depictions of the people who lived there.
Those are things that make Tarantino films, well, Tarantino films.
You know what other traits characterize Tarantino films? Smart,
snappy dialog, beautiful scenery, a camera that seems to live within each
character, great music that you will forever associate with that scene of the film, characters who
are unique and unexpected. All of it comes together in a fantastic way to tell
the story of a freed slave searching desperately across the South for his wife.
Django (Jamie Foxx) is rescued from slavery by the bounty
hunter Dr. King Schultz (Christoph Waltz). Leave it to Tarantino to name his
German slave liberator Dr. King. Django partners with Dr. Schultz to search for
his lovely bride, Broomhilda (Kerry Washington). Along the way, Django learns
the bounty hunting business while taking on Klan-member plantation owners,
armed gangs, and all manner of dangerous thugs.
Eventually, Django and Schultz learn of Broomhilda’s
whereabouts and devise a rescue plan. Broomhilda is in “Candieland”, an old
plantation in the heart of Mississippi that is notorious for mandingo fighting.
For the uninitiated, mandingo fighting pits two large slaves in a Greco-Roman
style fight-to-the-death. It’s all for the amusement of their white owners,
naturally. It’s a brutal affair, and very lucrative for those who can afford
it. Django and Schultz pose as a mandingo-fighting expert and a bored, rich,
German investor, respectively, to get access to Candieland and have the chance
to secure Broomhilda’s freedom.
Foxx and Waltz really bring these characters to life. Foxx
takes complete ownership of the role of Django (the ‘D’ is silent!). He’s got
swag, as the kids would say. He needs it too, since he often finds himself tossing
insults at a bunch of armed white men just before he guns them down. He’s a man
on a mission, and nothing is going to keep him from his wife, least of all some
punks with big rifles and tiny brains. He’s not just a brainless super-warrior though.
Django was a slave once, so he was never allowed to learn many things about
the world. There is a youthful
enthusiasm and innocence to Django as Dr. Schultz tells stories of Germany or
helps Django read wanted posters. The guy has had a hard life so far, and we
just want him to find his wife, settle down, and enjoy the rest of his days, even if it means blasting through dozens of elitist white folk to get there.
Of course, Waltz won an Academy Award for his portrayal of
Colonel Hans Landa in Tarantino’s last film, Inglourious Basterds and has secured another Best Supporting Actor
nomination for his work here. In Waltz, Tarantino has a rock solid actor whose
skill with language allows him to merge seamlessly from English to German to
French. Waltz is amazing not only because he knows so many languages, but also
because he knows how language itself is used. His speech can sometimes be
fluffy or flowery with million dollar words that require a thesaurus to
understand, but Waltz gives his words a singsong or rhythmic quality that allows
him to pull it off. For kicks, imagine Gerard Butler reading some of Schultz’
lines. He’d sound like a complete doofus. When Waltz says those things, it
makes Schultz likeable.
Unfortunately for Django and Waltz, Candieland is owned by
Calvin Candie (Leonardo DiCaprio), a bored, rich, powerful, and petulant man
who inherited the massive plantation from his daddy. His life is so sheltered
and automatic that he has long since handed off the day-to-day operations of
the plantation. Now he expounds on his ridiculous theories of the negro and
manages his mandingo fights. He’s snide and smarmy and overly proud. He can be
angry and nasty when he’s not getting his way, and he can be exuberant and
showy when he’s talking about something he
enjoys. He's a spoiled brat, basically. DiCaprio does wonders with the character.
The most important person in Candieland, however, is
Stephen. He keeps everyone in line, slave and white man alike, so that
Candieland runs like a well-oiled machine. Nothing happens without Stephen’s
knowledge. Samuel L. Jackson’s portrayal of the top slave in the plantation is spectacular. Jackson brought his A-game on this one. Whenever he’s on screen you
can’t take your eyes off the sneaky bastard.
Tarantino is able to bring each of these characters to life
in the most unexpected ways. Who is the most ruthless person in Candieland? Not
Calvin, the owner of the place and presumed “boss”. Not any of his henchmen and
hired muscle armed to the teeth with pistols and rifles. Stephen, himself a
slave, is absolutely the most fearsome guy around. Who is the most
compassionate person in the film? Not Django, who is willing to do anything
necessary to save his wife and goes all-in as a black slaver. It’s Dr. Schultz,
the bounty hunter. A man who kills other people and sells their bodies to the
law. Even Schultz’ horse, Fritz, has personality. He gives a little bow every
time Schultz introduces him. You don’t expect such detailed characters, but you
enjoy it when you see it.
There are many great things I could say about Django Unchained. It’s one of the most
entertaining films of 2012 (No, really. I put it at #3 on my Top 10 of 2012 list).
From the great little moments peppered throughout the film, to the great music,
to the cool cinematic flourishes, to the final epic conclusion, Django Unchained never disappoints. In
fact, it’s the type of film that gets better on repeated viewings. The second
time I saw it, I was able to get into the flow of the film and roll along with
the great story that Tarantino had prepared. It’s definitely worth the trip to
the theater to catch such an epic and fantastic film.
4.5 Stars out of 5
Are you a fan of Tarantino’s latest masterpiece? Are you
offended by geysers of fake blood and prolific use of the ‘n’ word? Let me know
in the comments below or on Twitter!
No comments:
Post a Comment